Hyperliquid has generated $429.04 million in revenue from Jan. 1 through Sept. 15, placing the perpetual futures platform first in CoinGecko’s adjusted ranking of crypto revenue generators for 2026. Summary Hyperliquid generated $429.04 million through September 15, leading CoinGecko’s adjusted 2026 crypto revenue ranking overall. Hyperliquid captured 12.62% of the $3.40 billion revenue pool used for CoinGecko’s project comparison dataset. Pump.fun ranked second with $322.21 million, leaving Hyperliquid ahead by more than $106 million overall. CoinGecko excluded Tether, Circle and Grayscale from rankings to improve comparisons among crypto-native revenue models. Hyperliquid routes trading fees toward community mechanisms, including automated HYPE purchases through its Assistance Fund. CoinGecko’s Sept. 17 study calculated Hyperliquid’s share at 12.62% of the $3.40 billion comparison pool. Pump.fun followed with $322.21 million, while Axiom Pro ranked third among the projects included in the final table. The ranking uses data through Sept. 15 and should be read as a fixed year-to-date snapshot. CoinGecko excluded Tether and Circle because their scale would overwhelm the comparison, while Grayscale was removed because its $154.14 million came from asset-management sponsor fees instead of a usage-based crypto protocol model. Hyperliquid leads 2026 crypto revenue ranking Hyperliquid finished more than $106 million ahead of Pump.fun at the Sept. 15 cutoff. CoinGecko said the two projects together generated $751.25 million, equal to 22.10% of the revenue pool used in the study. Pump.fun’s $322.21 million came mainly from token creation and trading fees tied to its Solana memecoin launchpad. Axiom Pro followed at $132.09 million, Sky posted $129.87 million and GMGN generated $126.03 million. Polymarket ranked sixth with $115.48 million. World Liberty Financial followed at $95.37 million, while Paxos recorded $87.93 million. edgeX generated $84.37 million and Titan Builder completed the top 10 at $83.47 million. CoinGecko classified the projects across several business models, including perpetual futures, trading terminals, prediction markets, stablecoins, real-world assets and MEV infrastructure. The researcher described its sector labels as a best-effort classification instead of a formal industry taxonomy. Perpetual trading feeds Hyperliquid’s revenue engine Hyperliquid earns fees from perpetual futures and spot activity on its exchange infrastructure. Its official fee documentation uses volume-based maker and taker tiers, with separate schedules for perpetual and spot markets. Higher-volume traders receive lower fees, while users staking HYPE can qualify for further discounts. Hyperliquid says its fee structure does not reserve the proceeds primarily for a company or insider group, with funds instead directed toward HLP, the Assistance Fund and eligible market deployers. The Assistance Fund automatically converts eligible trading fees into HYPE through Hyperliquid’s L1 execution. Hyperliquid’s current documentation says HYPE acquired by the fund is burned, permanently removing those tokens from total and circulating supply. Hyperliquid separately states that its platform is processing billions of dollars in daily trading volume and that more than $1 billion in annualized fees are being directed toward programmatic HYPE purchases. Fees and CoinGecko’s revenue figure are not identical accounting measures, so the two numbers should not be treated interchangeably. As crypto.news previously reported, Hyperliquid’s Assistance Fund has become a central part of HYPE’s token structure because trading activity creates recurring purchases of the token. Earlier reporting placed cumulative fund spending above $1.3 billion, though that figure covers buybacks since launch and is separate from CoinGecko’s 2026 revenue ranking. Pump.fun and trading terminals fill the next positions CoinGecko’s ranking shows that revenue has not been concentrated in a single crypto sector. Pump.fun represents token launchpads, while Axiom Pro and GMGN are trading terminals that make on-chain markets easier to access. Axiom integrates Hyperliquid for perpetual futures trading, creating some overlap between the activity surrounding the two projects even though CoinGecko records them as separate revenue-generating businesses. GMGN centers more heavily on Solana memecoin trading, linking its activity to the same trading segment that supports Pump.fun. Shorter reporting periods can produce different leaders. In August, Pump.fun briefly moved ahead of Hyperliquid on a 30-day revenue measure after generating more than $10 million of protocol fees during the week of Aug. 3-9. CoinGecko’s longer Jan. 1-Sept. 15 measurement produced a different result, with Hyperliquid retaining the full-year lead despite shorter periods in which competitors generated more revenue. The top 15 projects accounted for 56.02% of the $3.40 billion pool used for the ranking. Beyond the top 10, Collector Crypt recorded $72.82 million, Phantom $60.05 million, Aave $56.81 million, fomo $54.66 million and Aerodrome $54.31 million. CoinGecko exclusions change how the table should be read CoinGecko deliberately excluded Tether and Circle from the top-project ranking because both stablecoin issuers generate revenue at a scale the researcher said would obscure differences between the remaining businesses. Their omission does not mean CoinGecko regarded their revenue as invalid. Grayscale would have ranked third at $154.14 million, ahead of Axiom Pro, but CoinGecko excluded the asset manager because its revenue is derived from AUM-based sponsor fees. Aerodrome, which would otherwise have ranked 16th, consequently entered the displayed top 15. CoinGecko uses on-chain revenue as its main inclusion criterion but acknowledged that not every project in the list earns money directly from blockchain transaction fees. Paxos and World Liberty Financial, for example, derive substantial revenue from interest earned on reserves, according to the study. Monthly crypto revenue has remained below last year’s average. Across all projects tracked in CoinGecko’s second dataset, which does include Tether and Circle, monthly revenue averaged $1.08 billion from January through August 2026. The figure was 11.68% below the $1.22 billion monthly average recorded during 2025. September was left out of the monthly-average comparison because CoinGecko had only 15 days of data when the study was compiled. Its revenue rankings still include activity through Sept. 15, meaning later September revenue will not appear in the published $429.04 million Hyperliquid figure. HYPE trades near record levels after revenue growth HYPE has remained close to record territory while Hyperliquid’s fee activity stays elevated. CoinGecko data on Sept. 21 placed HYPE around $94.02, up approximately 2.7% over 24 hours and 18.1% during the previous seven days, with a market capitalization close to $20.9 billion. Historical CoinGecko data show HYPE closed at $76.92 on Sept. 15 before rising to $85.06 on Sept. 17 and $92.54 on Sept. 18. The token closed Sept. 20 at $93.64, while daily trading volume stood above $1 billion. Crypto.news reported that Hyperliquid and Pump.fun accounted for nearly 90% of tracked crypto token buybacks during 2026. The report distinguished annual buybacks from Hyperliquid’s cumulative Assistance Fund purchases, which span multiple years. Hyperliquid’s own documentation now lists maker rebates reaching negative 0.003% for qualifying high-volume market makers, while its highest published staking tier provides a 40% trading-fee discount to accounts linked with more than 500,000 HYPE staked.
