Bitcoin developers and crypto advocates are again debating how the network should handle Satoshi Nakamoto’s early Bitcoin holdings. Summary Bitcoin advocates argue touching Satoshi’s coins could weaken the network’s core ownership promise for holders. Quantum risks have revived debate over early Bitcoin wallets and cryptographic security planning across markets. Developers support post-quantum research while rejecting forced action against dormant Satoshi-linked coins across Bitcoin network. The discussion has grown as quantum computing concerns raise questions about old Bitcoin addresses and future security. Alex Thorn, head of firmwide research at Galaxy Digital, said many Bitcoin developers and advocates agree that Satoshi’s original coins should remain untouched. He said he discussed quantum risks and Bitcoin security with several market participants in Las Vegas. Thorn said the main concern is not only technical security. It is also about Bitcoin’s rule of ownership. He stated, “Satoshi’s coins should not be touched.” He added that violating those property rights could damage Bitcoin’s main value as a neutral money network. Quantum risk renews debate over old wallets The debate focuses on early Pay-to-Public-Key Bitcoin addresses. These addresses used an older structure and may become more exposed if powerful quantum computers can break current cryptography in the future. Some users fear that Satoshi’s coins could become a large target. Thorn described the risk as lower than many people assume. He noted that Satoshi’s estimated coins sit across about 22,000 addresses, with many holding 50 BTC each. That structure would make a broad attack harder to execute. Moreover, a major concern is what would happen if Satoshi’s coins moved or were stolen. Such an event would likely create panic, since those coins have remained untouched since Bitcoin’s earliest years. Thorn argued that the Bitcoin market has already handled very large sell-offs in the past. He suggested that many Bitcoiners may accept even a deep drawdown rather than approve any forced action against Satoshi-linked wallets. He said, “Suffer a 50% drawdown” may be an acceptable trade-off for keeping Bitcoin’s property rights intact. Developers still watch quantum threat The support for leaving Satoshi’s coins alone does not mean the community is ignoring quantum computing. Developers continue to study post-quantum tools that may help protect Bitcoin users if the risk becomes more practical. Active users, companies, exchanges, and custodians can also move funds to newer address types when needed. This makes large live wallets easier to protect than dormant coins whose owners may never return.
