SoSoValue data show listed companies bought just $70K of bitcoin last week, a 99.93% drop, with only BHODL adding 1 BTC as majors sat out. Summary Publicly listed companies bought just $70,000 worth of bitcoin last week, a 99.93% drop from the prior week, according to SoSoValue. Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) and Japan’s Metaplanet both reported zero new purchases, while UK firm BHODL was the only disclosed buyer at $72,832 for 1 BTC. Despite the pause, listed companies still hold 1,023,333 BTC worth about $6.939 billion, or 5.1% of bitcoin’s circulating market value. Bitcoin’s (BTC) once‑relentless corporate accumulation has effectively stalled, with net purchases by publicly listed companies collapsing 99.93% week‑on‑week to just $70,000, new data from SoSoValue show. As of 8 a.m. Eastern on March 30, 2026, non‑mining listed firms worldwide added a net 1 BTC over the period, compared with hundreds of times that figure only a week earlier. It is one of the weakest weekly prints since SoSoValue began tracking corporate treasuries, and it comes as spot prices chop sideways and ETF flows turn choppy. The sharp slowdown is visible in the behavior of the sector’s bellwethers. Strategy, the firm formerly known as MicroStrategy and long the poster child for corporate bitcoin bets, “has not announced any Bitcoin purchases” for the week, SoSoValue notes. Japanese listed company Metaplanet also sat on its hands, registering “eleven consecutive weeks without purchases” after a run of smaller but regular buys in 2025. Together, the two had been among the most consistent incremental buyers in past quarters, with Strategy alone at one point holding over 1% of total supply in its treasury Only bhodl steps in as others pause Against that backdrop, the UK‑based bitcoin company BHODL was the only listed entity SoSoValue records as adding to its stack last week. On March 26, BHODL “announced it invested $72,832 to buy 1 Bitcoin,” a modest purchase in absolute terms but one that stands out in an otherwise barren week. At the same time, two European firms laid out plans to scale exposure via deals and fresh capital rather than immediate spot buying. Swedish health‑tech company H100 said it intends to acquire Norwegian firms Moonshot AS and Never Say Die AS through an all‑stock transaction, with the goal of increasing its bitcoin holdings to 3,501 BTC once the deal closes. French bitcoin asset manager Capital B, meanwhile, “announced it has completed a financing of 2.8 million euros to advance Bitcoin purchases,” effectively raising dry powder rather than deploying it immediately. Treasuries still hold 5.1% of circulating supply Despite the near‑zero weekly flow, corporate treasuries remain a meaningful structural holder of the asset. SoSoValue calculates that publicly listed companies (excluding miners) now hold a combined 1,023,333 BTC, with a current market value “of approximately $6.939 billion,” equivalent to about 5.1% of bitcoin’s circulating market capitalization. That total is up by just 0.000098% compared with the prior week, underscoring how muted net accumulation has become in recent sessions. In earlier crypto.news coverage of corporate treasury adoption, the focus was on how firms like Strategy and Metaplanet were using bitcoin as a long‑term balance‑sheet hedge, echoing a broader trend of companies adding bitcoin alongside cash and bonds. In a separate crypto.news story on ETF‑driven flows, analysts highlighted how spot bitcoin ETFs have increasingly become the marginal price‑setter, with fund flows sometimes overshadowing direct corporate purchases. A third crypto.news story on market structure noted that when ETF demand cools and macro conditions tighten, even the most aggressive treasury buyers tend to move to the sidelines. This week’s 99.93% drop in net listed‑company buying fits that pattern. With ETFs, macro data and regulatory headlines now setting the tone, corporate treasuries appear to be waiting for clearer signals before committing fresh billions—leaving bitcoin’s next leg more dependent on fund flows and retail than on another MicroStrategy‑style spree.
